[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:54:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Jan-Peter,
>
> 2014-07-29 9:34 GMT+02:00 Jan-Peter Voigt <address@hidden>:
>> Hi Janek,
>>
>> your predefined context are cool :)
>
> Thanks!
>
>> I see them in context with my lalily templates -- they will of course
>> benifit. And the editionEngraver can indeed take advantage from specific
>> context names. But still there need to be a way to separate (for
>> example) violin 1 and 2.
>
> As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
>
> \newInstrument "ViolinI" "Violin" "StaffGroup"\with { } \with { }
> \newInstrument "ViolinII" "Violin" "StaffGroup"\with { } \with { }
>
> and have ViolinI and ViolinII available.
Would it be feasible to put the context mods _before_ some reasonably
related argument, possibly like
\newInstrument \with {} "ViolinI" "Violin" \with {} "StaffGroup"
or probably
\newInstrument "Violin" \with {} "ViolinI" \with {} "StaffGroup" ?
Because when they are before a related non-optional argument, one can
make them optional. Then if they are just \with {} anyway, you can omit
them.
--
David Kastrup
- thanks again for the editionEngraver, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/07/18
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/07/20
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/07/27
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/07/28
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Janek Warchoł, 2014/07/28
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/07/29
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Janek Warchoł, 2014/07/29
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Janek Warchoł, 2014/07/30
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, David Kastrup, 2014/07/30
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Janek Warchoł, 2014/07/30
- Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver, Janek Warchoł, 2014/07/31