Re: would 'gn' for G-natural be useful in \language "english" ?

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith OHara" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 7:41 AM
Subject: would 'gn' for G-natural be useful in \language "english" ?


> Dear user list,
>   The suggestion quoted below from the bug-lilypond list
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2014-08/msg00037.html>
> makes sense to me, as an addition to the \language "english"  note-names.
>
> It would not fit in German-style pitch-names, where 'cis' and 'ces' get 
> completely distinct names from 'c'.
> I am not sure if something similar makes sense in fixed-do naming as used 
> in French and Spanish.
>
> Would anyone else like to see 'fn' as a second way to express F-natural in 
> English (in addition to the existing 'f') ?


My vote: no.  I don't see the point of adding an alias.

--
Phil Holmes