Re: partcombine/divisi framework - let the fun begin!

[Janek Warchoł]

2014-08-29 8:53 GMT+02:00 Keith OHara <address@hidden>:
> Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I'm working on putting together a set of functions for handling parts
>> that split into multiple voices and/or staves
>
>
>> Attachment (definitions.ily): text/x-lilypond, 2359 bytes
>> Attachment (example.ly): text/x-lilypond, 825 bytes
>> Attachment (example.pdf): application/pdf, 33 KiB
>
> I like the way 'definitions.ily' uses <<>> parallel music constructions
> to ensure that the parts re-synchronize even if there is a note missing
> in the input.
>
> You should do something similar for the \together segments.

Ok, will do.

> As you have it now, the together segments are un-tagged, so are included
> in all three staves (two of which are not printed).
> But if someone uses these definitions with music that uses tags for
> some other purpose, the tagged music will be left out.

Hmm.  That's a problem, but i don't see a good solution yet.
best,
Janek