lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with wrong font/glyphs/graphics


From: Frank Steinmetzger
Subject: Re: Problem with wrong font/glyphs/graphics
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:34:34 +0200
User-agent: Mutt 1.5.22 (2013-10-16, Gentoo 1.5.22-r3)

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:55:51PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2014-08-25 0:40 GMT+02:00 Frank Steinmetzger <address@hidden>:
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 10:51:53PM +0200, Malte Meyn wrote:
> >> That is a known problem. If I remember correctly this only occurs with
> >> some old versions of LilyPond when using a certain version of
> >> ghostscript, but I don’t remember the exact details ...
> >>
> >> What versions of LilyPond (lilypond --version) and ghostscript
> >> (ghostscript --version) do you use?
> >
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > Lilypond 2.16.2 and ghostscript 9.10. But it has been so since I installed
> > this system in March, there were no upgrades ever since. Some other package
> > must be the culprit.
>
> The problem was actually caused by metafont or metapost, not
> ghostscript.

I rebuild the direct dependencies for lilypond and also for ghostscript
(including texlive-metapost), but that didn’t help. However, I encountered a
problem actually building lilypond 2.16.2 -- it fails with
freetype-error.cc:34:31: warning: freetype/fterrors.h: No such file or directory

The file it was looking for is actually at /usr/include/freetype2/fterrors.h.
I checked a few other freetype-dependent packages and also another distro
(Arch), in case it was a problem of my own (Gentoo). All use include/freetype2.
It’s EOL now, but could this be a bug in the lilypond code?

> I think that upgrading to the latest stable LilyPond
> release may help you (and anyway 2.16 is quite old).

I am aware of that, but apparently the package maintainer is not (the 2.18
package has been available for a while now, but not marked yet as “stable”
and I don’t want to customise my package manager setup too much).

> See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-10/msg00204.html
> for more details.

Interesting. What puzzled me at first was that both my machines had the same
versions of stuff installed, but still had different output. So I dug a bit
deeper and found out that the last time I actually built lilypond on the
working one it still had texlive 2012.

There is a separate metapost package available which provides version 1.803.
I installed that, set the system to use it and rebuilt lilypond. Now the
output is fine again. I’ll remember that for later.

Cheers.

-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service.

The flesh was willing, but the grass was wet.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]