lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: postscript point


From: Alexander Kobel
Subject: Re: postscript point
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:23:10 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.6.0

On 09/11/2014 12:44 PM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,

I wanted to remove the indentation at the start of a score, and found

\paper {
   indent = 0\cm
}

in the manual. Wondering why to use \cm I soon discovered that it
doesn't matter if I use 0\cm or 0\in or 0\pt or simply 0 without any
unit. It all works. So now I use indent = 0

Hi Martin,

IIRC, if you leave out the unit, the number is interpreted as staff spaces (i.e., the vertical distance between two lines in a default staff). Typically, that's not what you expect, so a lot of people got used to explicitly writing the unit even if it is not required for zero (anymore?).

But my question is about something else. Reading NR 5.4.3 (Lilypond
2.18) I read: "points, 1/72.27 of an inch"

I have always learnt that a postscript point is defined as exactly 1/72
of an inch. Where does the (small) difference come from?

It's the typographical point, which is defined as, well, 1/72.27 of an inch. In contrast, the 1/72 inch (also called a DTP point, bigpoint or bp) was used as a simplification, but does not respect older typographic standards. And yes, it became famous with PostScript, but that does not mean that applications using PostScript need to use it as an internal unit. By the way, these definitions of pt and bp match those from TeX as well as other common DTP applications, vector graphics software and most word processors.
Also see:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_(typography)


Best,
Alexander



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]