[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭
From: |
Martin Tarenskeen |
Subject: |
Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭ |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 22:34:56 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) |
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, MarcM wrote:
I agree it is not easier to type but any non-techie musician will find this
easier to read.
Adding shortcuts in Frescobaldi will help type the ♯ and ♭.
A non-techie might have problems knowing the difference between # and ♯, and
between b and ♭
And what about the double-sharp? What symbol would be used for that?
I agree it is easier to read. But you normally don't use LilyPond just to
read music. But if you do, you are definitely not a non-techie :-)
IMO opinion using these unicode symbols for sharps and flats is an
interesting idea - but I personally will probably never use it.
--
MT
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, (continued)
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Malte Meyn, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Hans Aberg, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Simon Albrecht, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, MarcM, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Janek Warchoł, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Robert Schmaus, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭,
Martin Tarenskeen <=
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, David Bellows, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Owain Sutton, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Noeck, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Owain Sutton, 2014/10/06
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, MarcM, 2014/10/06
- Re: Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Noeck, 2014/10/07
- Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Richard Shann, 2014/10/07
Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, Tim Roberts, 2014/10/06
Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭, MING TSANG, 2014/10/06