Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭

[Noeck]

Am 06.10.2014 um 22:58 schrieb Owain Sutton:
>> IMO opinion using these unicode symbols for sharps and flats is an
>> interesting idea - but I personally will probably never use it.
> 
> I agree, it's likely to remain a niche option. I don't see that as a reason 
> for 
> not including it though, and as for double-sharps, is "c♯♯" more problematic 
> than "cciscis"?

That’s a bit exaggerated. It is cisis in Dutch and German etc. And
that’s just how you would call that note in these languages. So that’s a
very natural choice.

Back to the ♯ and ♭: I would also say: Why not integrate this into
lilypond (even though I would not use it because I want to use the keys
on my keyboard). In that case the double sharps should be done the same way:
𝄪 (U+1D12A) and
𝄫 (U+1D12B)

Cheers,
Joram