Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭

[Owain Sutton]

On 23:58, Mon 06 Oct 2014, Noeck wrote:
> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:58:29 +0200
> From: Noeck <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭
> To: address@hidden
> List-Id: LilyPond user discussion <lilypond-user.gnu.org>
> 
> Am 06.10.2014 um 22:58 schrieb Owain Sutton:
> >> IMO opinion using these unicode symbols for sharps and flats is an
> >> interesting idea - but I personally will probably never use it.
> > 
> > I agree, it's likely to remain a niche option. I don't see that as a reason 
> > for 
> > not including it though, and as for double-sharps, is "c♯♯" more 
> > problematic 
> > than "cciscis"?
> 
> That’s a bit exaggerated. It is cisis in Dutch and German etc. And
> that’s just how you would call that note in these languages. So that’s a
> very natural choice.
> 

Hah, my mistake....which I never make when actually typing Lilypond code...the 
Dutch has become second nature, but only when actually in context.