[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Time signature differs from measure length
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: Time signature differs from measure length |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:08:14 -0700 |
Joram,
For me correct is "what makes more sense to my reading/interpretation of the
music." I use Lilypond to score music for my own performance (generally
private), therefore I need not conform to Gould.
My suggestion is to do whatever makes the experience better for you.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Noeck [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 3:46 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek; lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Time signature differs from measure length
> -----Original Message-----
> I want to write a piece with a alla-breve time signature but with four
> half notes in a measure (4/2).
>
> Is it better to overwrite the time signature stencil and use \time 4/2 or do
> it like this:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \relative c'' \scaleDurations 1/2 {
> \time 2/2
> r2 g g g | f f g b | b a b1
> }
> Noeck,
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-09/msg00603.html
> might be of help.
>
> Mark
Thanks. I should have found this.
My main question which solution is more correct? Scaling the durations or
changing the printed time signature?
Joram
- Time signature differs from measure length, Noeck, 2014/10/09
- RE: Time signature differs from measure length, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/10/09
- Re: Time signature differs from measure length, Noeck, 2014/10/10
- RE: Time signature differs from measure length,
Mark Stephen Mrotek <=
- Re: Time signature differs from measure length, Simon Albrecht, 2014/10/10
- RE: Time signature differs from measure length, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/10/10
- Re: Time signature differs from measure length, Simon Albrecht, 2014/10/10
- RE: Time signature differs from measure length, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/10/10
- Re: Time signature differs from measure length, Noeck, 2014/10/10