[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: dots below after <>
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: dots below after <> |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:06:26 -0700 |
Phil,
Thank you for redirecting me.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Holmes [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:02 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek; 'Dr. Bernhard Kleine'; address@hidden
Subject: Re: dots below after <>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Stephen Mrotek" <address@hidden>
To: "'Dr. Bernhard Kleine'" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 3:54 PM
Subject: RE: dots below after <>
> Bernhard,
>
> Location is determined by one of three signs: "^" for above, "-" for
> at side," and "_" for below. So for your example: < h f' >_.
>
> Look at
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-
> attached-to-notes
>
> Mark
The actual problem here is that the user has created some implicit voices
<< \rightone \\ \righttwo >>
rightone is implicitly voiceOne, which has all articulations above the note,
and righttwo is voiceTwo, with articulations below the note. He has then
ignored the obvious error message telling him righttwo does not exist.
error: unknown escaped string: `\righttwo'
} << \rightone \\
\righttwo >>
Delete \\ righttwo and all is well.
--
Phil Holmes