[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dots below after <>
|
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
|
Subject: |
Re: dots below after <> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:50:38 -0000 |
Dr. Bernhard Kleine wrote Monday, October 27, 2014 4:19 PM
> I have corrected the error with the wrongly labeled \rightTwo. That example
> then went without an error message. However, the < h f' > _-. still raises an
> error.
Mark gave you the answer in his original reply, below. The dot must be
prefixed by just one of "-", "^" or "_". Not two.
> Von: Mark Stephen Mrotek [mailto:address@hidden
> Gesendet: Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 16:54
> An: 'Dr. Bernhard Kleine'; address@hidden
> Betreff: RE: dots below after <>
>
> Location is determined by one of three signs: "^" for above, "-" for at
> side," and "_" for below. So for your example: < h f' >_.
>
> Look at
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes
>