lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Slur and acciaccatura in chords


From: Abraham Lee
Subject: Re: Slur and acciaccatura in chords
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:02:32 -0600

Oops, I meant

#:roman "lilyjazztext"
#:sans "lilyjazzchord"

Sorry for the confusion!

-Abraham

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 29, 2014, at 4:44 PM, tisimst <address@hidden> wrote:

Stephen,

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Stephen MacNeil [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Abraham,

Thanks for all the help. I do like your code it works really nice. As for the voices

>And just so you know, the << { ... }\\{ ... } >> implicitly applies
>\voiceOne and \voiceTwo, so those are unnecessary.

I did realize that however  i read a post somewhere saying that if you explicitly reference \voiceOne \voiceTwo the slur may look better. Guess it was wrong since I did end up using \shape. Anyway I am wondering why when I add and extra voice using << { ... }\\{ ... } >> (as guitar voices sometimes are added and subtracted at random), the stem length changes.


Sorry. I'm not sure why that happens. Maybe it's that LP is having some difficulty determining "normal" dimensions with the clashing NoteColumns?


\version "2.18.2"

%\include "../fonts/im/improviso.ily"

\relative c'{

\time 6/8

<e g c>8^"incorrect" <e g b> <e g c>

<<{\stemUp <\tweak Flag.transparent ##t e g>8}\\{\slurDown \stemUp \shape #'((0.2 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0.3)) Slur \acciaccatura d'8 c <e, g b> <e g c>}>> |

}


\relative c'{

\time 6/8

<e g c>8^"correct" <e g b> <e g c>

\shape #'((0.2 . 1.1) (0.5 . 1.5) (0.3 . 2.2) (0.1 . 2.8)) Slur

\acciaccatura d'8 <e, g c> <e g b> <e g c>

}


This is easily fixed however with


\override Stem.details.beamed-lengths = #'(3.5)


example:


\relative c'{

\time 6/8

<e g c>8^"incorrect" <e g b> <e g c>

<<{\stemUp <\tweak Flag.transparent ##t e g>8}\\{\slurDown \stemUp \shape #'((0.2 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0.3)) Slur \override Stem.details.beamed-lengths = #'(3.5) \acciaccatura d'8 c <e, g b> <e g c>}>> |

}


Anyway I was just curious on that.


Oh  I tried the fonts out, I am a big fan of font that looks hand written. So I really liked

improviso.ily. I have used jazzlily for a long time and was wondering has it been updated since before?


anyway


Thanks again


LilyJAZZ has *definitely* been updated. I've added numerous elements, including articulations, microtonal accidentals, scripts, harmonics, etc. It's quite complete now. It has also been updated in that it is used without any fancy coding hacks :) Just do like you did with Improviso and use the LilyJAZZ stylesheet via

\include "LilyJAZZ.ily"

or manually,

\paper {
  #(define fonts
    (set-global-fonts
    #:music "lilyjazz"
    #:brace "lilyjazz"
    #:roman "LilyJAZZText"
    #:sans "LilyJAZZChords"
    #:factor (/ staff-height pt 20)
    ))
}

in your score and you should be good to go!

Regards,
Abraham


View this message in context: RE:Slur and acciaccatura in chords
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]