[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: thanks again for the editionEngraver |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:21:23 -0400 |
Hi Urs,
> original breaks *are* part of the content so that's not a mixture.
I disagree: original breaks are, in my opinion, part of the original
presentation (engraving) of the content. There are, of course, grey areas in
the “content versus presentation” discussion — e.g., are clefs content or
presentation? (lately I’m leaning towards “presentation”) — but I’m solidly of
the opinion that dimensional engraving choices like line and page breaks, which
were dictated almost entirely by the physical [hence presentational] properties
of the original engraving, are presentation.
For the record, that still doesn’t change my opinion about your functions: They
are worthy of existing, and could be a useful addition to the main distro.
Best,
Kieren.
_______________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www: <http://www.kierenmacmillan.info>
email: address@hidden