Re: Unicode Font Issues

[Shane Brandes]

XFCE is also a useful desktop interface. Unity might be good for
tablet minded people but, at least, I found it to be highly disruptive
of making any sort of useful workflow. Whichever shell one chooses
Lilypond always performs excellently.

Shane Brandes

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Bric <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11/03/2014 08:09 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Bric wrote:
>>
>>> One particular, however:  I would stay away from "Unity", and opt for
>>> "GNOME" during installation. Someone could still correct me and persuade me
>>> about the glory of Unity, but I have instinctively disliked it from its
>>> inception, and am happily using the "traditional" Gnome.
>>
>>
>> With "traditional" do you mean Gnome 2.x or the new Gnome 3.x +
>> Gnome-shell?
>>
>> Just like Unity (which I have not tried yet) Gnome3/Gnome-shell can be
>> quite a shock if you are looking for a "traditional" desktop. I am really
>> happy with it now, but it did take some time to get used to.
>>
>> There are other alternatives if you are looking for something more
>> "traditional". Linux = freedom of choice.
>>
>
> good point. I guess there was a big leap from 2 to 3.  I am using 3.10.4
> currently.  The bigger differences though are internal, AFAICT; the exterior
> of 3 doesn't seem that much different from 2.0.  (And I did use the word
> "traditional" in quotes, originally ;-)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user