Re: Lilypond 2.16 and 2.18 incompatibility for \relative without absolute note outside the score

[Shane Brandes]

How is it you are not going to get screwed to the wall for making this?

Shane

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Mark Veltzer <address@hidden> wrote:
> The idea is that the end user who builds the book can select transposition
> (say to trumpet), which tunes to put into the book, turn lyrics on and off,
> turn rehersal markings on and off, tunes have several versions (of which you
> can select one), uniformity of presentation (which is taken away from the
> individual tunes and centralized), font, indexes of various kinds (I already
> have index by poet and by composer) and more.
>
> I still need to develop a GUI for this but you are supposed to be able to do
> this without editing any lilypond and using a simple GUI.
>
> In addition I can render any tune individually (ofcourse).
>
> This is all possible with just working with one big (28,000 line) file. Or
> just lilypond snipplets and includes, with no templating. It's just harder.
> Much harder.
>
> I could have done this with guile I expect but I find the language not
> appealing. Python is much more to my taste.
>
> Cheers,
>     Mark
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Federico Bruni <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Il giorno mer 5 nov 2014 alle 20:39, Mark Veltzer <address@hidden>
>> ha scritto:
>>
>> you can now see the results of the project on:
>>
>> http://veltzer.github.io/openbook
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the link.
>>
>> Honestly, it's not what I was expecting. It's basically a PDF embedded in
>> a simple HTML page. The PDF may be created much more easily using only ly
>> files. Why using the mako template then?
>> What I'm missing?
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>