lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gregorian chant input in LilyPond


From: Br. Samuel Springuel
Subject: Re: Gregorian chant input in LilyPond
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 17:48:40 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

The biggest issue for this would be the fact that gabc and lilypond notation approach representing music from two different view points.

The different heights (a to m) in gabc represent the actual position of the neume on the staff, regardless of the clef position. As a result "g" may correspond to fa, re, ti (or ta), so, mi, or do depending on the clef (c1, c2, c3 (flatted), c4, f3, or f4). Given that Gregorian chant uses a movable do, this isn't as illogical as it may sound because one group may choose different pitches for the same neume on the same clef in different pieces and different groups may sing the same piece at different pitches. There really is very little correspondence between a note's pitch and where it appears on the staff. What matters is the relation between the notes (the scale) not the actual pitches. In short: gabc represents the *visual representation* of a chant score (i.e. what appears in the manuscript), not the musical content.

Lilypond notation, on the other hand, is very much tied to the pitch. a' (in absolute mode) is A440 and means that regardless of key settings (relative mode and the transpose function both play with this mapping). This makes sense because modern music (which Lilypond is designed around) uses a fixed do. Regardless of who performs a piece, or which piece a note appears in, the same note represents the same pitch. In short: lilypond notation represents the *musical content* (i.e. what we hear), not how it visually appears on the page (position tweaks, stencil tweaks, etc. excepted).

Any attempt to convert from gabc to lilypond would require bridging that gap by establishing conventions for how the height of a note on the staff maps on to a particular pitch. That's not to say that isn't possible (the visual representation and the musical content are related, after all, otherwise scores would be meaningless), but it would require some thinking out and I suspect that not everyone would be satisfied with any particular solution.

✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝✝
Br. Samuel, OSB
(R. Padraic Springuel)

PAX ☧ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]