Re: polyphony and bendAfter

[Gagi Petrovic]

Hi all,

Could the ignoring of the  before mentioned bendAfter be a bug, or does it work as intended?

If it isn't, where can I do bug reports?

And in case it is, where can I propose enhancement requests?

Thanks!
Gagi

On Jan 19, 2015 9:39 AM, "Gagi Petrovic" <address@hidden> wrote:

Dear LilyPond group,

Does anyone know how to correctly implement a bendAfter with polyphony? When i do

  <e a,>\bendAfter #1 c c

LilyPond simply ignores the bendAfter.

The following example works, but isn't a very efficient/elegant workaround. Besides, it's technically not correct either since the bend should depart from both notes.

 <<    
    {
      \hideNotes
      e2\bendAfter #2
    }
    \\
    { \unHideNotes
      <e a,>2 c c c
    }     
 >>

Any clue would be greatly appreciated :)

Thanks in advance and all the best,

Gagi

full code:
\version "2.18.2"

\score {
  \new Staff {
    \relative c' { \cadenzaOn
   
 <<     
    {
      \hideNotes
      e2\bendAfter #2
    }
    \\
    { \unHideNotes

      <e a,>2 c c c
    }     
 >>
 
  <e a,>\bendAfter #1 c c
           
    }
  }
}