|
On 05/02/15 19:05, Brian Barker wrote:
You *have* missed the point here, I
think. It is indeed not obvious what may affect what, so someone
will have to experiment, removing details piecemeal until just
before the problem disappears. The idea of minimal examples is
that if you are not prepared to do some of the work in that
investigation, why would anyone else want to do it for you? That
seems a reasonable concept to me.
OK, i think i see what is meant now thank you
Incidentally, your syllable division is a bit irregular, I think.
You have "sur-re-xit", which is right, I think, but also
"su-rrex-it", which almost certainly isn't. Surely
"be-ne-di-ca-mus", not "be-ne-dic-a-mus"? "Mu-lie-er-es" should
surely be "mu-li-er-es"? "Pa-ssus" -> "pas-sus"? "Miserrimo":
is that a word? Are there more?
Thanks, i'll tighten that up
C.
|