Re: bar number for \partial 4

[MING TSANG]

Please note I did not type "ambitious d" when I use iphone 5 to send the email. I don't know what "ambitious d" meant. Sorry.

On Monday, February 16, 2015 12:22 PM, Using <address@hidden> wrote:

Sorry, it is LSR. I had been using this ambitious d it served me well.  Next time I will search LSR, then NR.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 16, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:

Am 16.02.2015 16:13, schrieb MING TSANG:

Thank you.

Yes I did try the snippet  and did not find any sample.

What snippet? An example of what? The Notation Reference is often the first place to go.
Yours, Simon

Immanuel,

Ming.

On Monday, February 16, 2015 10:09 AM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:

Am 16.02.2015 15:55, schrieb MING TSANG:

Hi, lilyponder,

(1) I am transcribe a score that it count the \partial 4 measure as bar #1. How to achieve this.

(1) This is contradicting both musical logics and general usage, so why not change it? Of course I don’t know your reason to keep so close to the model.
(2) \set Score.currentBarNumber – see <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/bars#bar-numbers>

(2) how to code repeat tremolo for a chord?

<ges'' as c es>1:64 or \repeat tremolo 64 <ges'' as c es>64 – see <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/short-repeats#tremolo-repeats>.
This is really easy to find, either through the chapter list or in the index at “tremolo”. Did you even try?

HTH, Simon

Immanuel,

Ming

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user