Re: Your thoughts on Lilypond exposure (2015)

[Jacques Menu]

Hello Grey,

How will you « mix », so to say, LP scores with files from remix software, and 
how can a user modify/enrich music produced by the latter directly on the web 
site, without having these software installed on their workstation?

JM

> Le 21 févr. 2015 à 18:20, Grey <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> Taste is somewhat a broad term but pretty much.
> 
> I could estimate 5 ways it's going to be use.
> 
> 1. re-composition of existing piece (same instruments)
> 2. new composition (different instrument)
> 3. new composition (remix/cover)
> 4. listening in general
> 5. new composition in general
> 
> In regard to number 3, if you were to think in terms of what a composition
> is, you could say writing musical score is a form of a remix of a song,
> therefor I think their will be a section for just those who does the
> remix/cover but doesn't exactly use musical score but uses remix software*
> fruityloop, garageband, logic pro* etc etc. If you were to look at it in
> terms of that, these software produces their own "musical scores" and it
> would be fair to share them with other users who uses similar software.
> 
> I could only imagine many people having a fun time building upon each other
> piece, and it might even get somewhat addicting depending on if you're an
> enthusiast or not. It might just be me, but so far I haven't seen a site
> with the right UI out there yet for this, let me know if I"m wrong.
> 
> Call it the home of networking for musical composition. There are many sites
> out there like this already but the popular ones are embedded only for their
> technology such as noteflight. I want to keep the site as a "free software".
> The other second thing would be their search feature and how the results are
> organize, it isn't made for composition purpose.
> 
> Also to put this out there now. The second goal of the site is the
> contribution back to the original artist. The UI made it simpler to be able
> to backtrack to the original artist (not user) and depending on how much
> views/listen or whatever, it would make sense financially to give me the
> money back to the artist. If any big artist ever decide they want to post
> their music on the site and sell it (digital copies), they can keep all
> their commission. Royalty rates and all that things are annoying, I made
> sure to include 3 other options (in the mockup) that could fund the site
> with highest return rates (hopefully).
> 
> It's pretty much a site around mutual relationship between artist and
> benefiting the artist financially or through exposure, based around musical
> scores. I could only imagine the backend to be somewhat complex for the long
> term goal of giving back financially to the original artist.
> 
> I hope that answer you question.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Your-thoughts-on-Lilypond-exposure-2015-hackathon-challenge-to-popularise-Lilypond-anyone-tp172123p172132.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user