Re: Bug in articulate.ly

[H. S. Teoh]

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:44:24AM +0100, Anton Curl wrote:
> 
> On 28/02/2015 20:11, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >Ideally, I'd like to be able to specify interpretations of elements
> >in the typeset score, for example, something like: % (This is
> >hypothetical syntax) | \interpret{ a1\prall } { b16 a gis b a2. } |
> >which would cause the { a1\prall } appear on the score, but { b16 a
> >gis b a2. } to be output to MIDI in its place. I know \articulate
> >already expands prall trillers, but the idea is that you'd specify
> >what should appear the score alongside with its specific
> >interpretation (or one of the many possible interpretations thereof).
> >Another example is that you could indicate "tempo rubato" and then
> >specify as interpretation one of the many possible actual tempo(s)
> >that would be used for rendering the MIDI.
> 
> Hi !
> 
> You can use tags for this:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source.html#using-tags
[...]

Excellent idea! I didn't think of using tags for this purpose, but it
sounds like exactly what I need. :-) Thanks!


T

-- 
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.