[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chord names broken since 2.16
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: Chord names broken since 2.16 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:58:40 +0100 |
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:33:52 +0100
Jan Kohnert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Version 2 whould probably be read more quickly and correct by Jazz
> musicians, version 1 is more "correct" for a non-expert,
I doubt this. Even a non-expert needs to know a few basic things. E.g., C is
a major triad. Cm is minor triad. 7 is a dominant 7th. 9 implies 7. 11
implies 7 and 9. Sus4 implies no 3rd. That's about it.
A real non-expert would go for <c e g> and so on.
A bottom line for me is that different combinations of notes should not
collapse into the same chord symbol, and that established conventions
should be followed as much as possible.
See e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninth_chord
-- Johan
- Chord names broken since 2.16, Amelie Zapf, 2015/03/15
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Amelie Zapf, 2015/03/15
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Thomas Morley, 2015/03/15
- Message not available
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Thomas Morley, 2015/03/15
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Johan Vromans, 2015/03/15
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Jan Kohnert, 2015/03/15
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/03/16
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Jan Kohnert, 2015/03/16
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16,
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Jan Kohnert, 2015/03/17
Re: Chord names broken since 2.16, Jan Kohnert, 2015/03/15