lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Directional NoteHead Stencil Support


From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: Directional NoteHead Stencil Support
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:02:28 +0100

2015-03-22 9:04 GMT+01:00 Marc Hohl <address@hidden>:
> Hi Harm,
>
> Am 21.03.2015 um 21:02 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> [...]
>>
>> Thanks Marc and David pointing me in the correct direction.
>>
>> This is issue 3289
>> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3289
>>
>> Curing a regression detected in 2.17. which was introduced during 2.15.
>>
>> Though, I have never seen this commit-message before!
>> During the revue on Rietvield some more extended message was wished
>> and obviously added right before pushing - no chance for anyone to
>> look at it.
>
>
> Well, there has been quite *a lot* of mail traffic concerning the committer
> and the use of comments both within the code and for commits.
>>
>>
>> If I had seen:
>>>
>>>      Lastly, there was no reason in the code base to keep a pointer to
>>> the
>>>      arpeggio in the note column, so it is removed here.
>>
>> I would have protested strongly.
>>
>> Instead
>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=621
>> is partly broken.
>>
>> http://lilypondblog.org/2013/06/horizontally-aligning-full-measure-rests/
>> is partly broken.
>>
>> Also, some of my custom-functions are partly broken or never reached
>> usability because of that missing 'arpeggio-property.
>> Letting me no reasonable chance to get back the needed info.
>> For more than a year!
>
>
> I cannot judge on the technical reasons for having an 'arpeggio property
> versus some circular dependencies. If you think that this is crucial, then
> it's probably the best to raise an issue for that, otherwise this discussion
> and all your work gets lost.
>
>> Color me annoyed and frustrated.
>> Right now I have no interest in fixing the above.
>> I'll let that to someone else, maybe the committer.
>
>
> One more reason to raise an issue on the tracker.
>
> Please keep up your valuable work for LilyPond!

I didn't mean to quit work on/with LilyPond.

Though sometime you have to love her very much ...

Cheers,
  Harm

>
> Cheers,
>
> Marc
>>
>>
>>
>> -Harm
>>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]