Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2

[address@hidden]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Bernard" <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden, "Lillypond Users Mailing List" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:23:40 AM
> Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
> 
> Well, you have a C natural in the group of 32s, and then in the last bar a
> C#, so generally engravers will put a sharp to revert the previous natural
> and let the performer know we are back to normal (cadenza or not). That’s
> how I learned music (I think!).

Yes, I have accidentals in the cadenza section.  As I stated, however, in the 
final measure the cadenza has been ended and a bar line has been crossed so the 
key signature is in full force again.  All accidentals from the previous 
measure are now null and void.  Obviously, LilyPond is behaving the way it 
does.  My point and question still stand:

POINT:
The documentation is not entirely clear on this issue.  It is not spelled out 
when, precisely, the key signature/accidental rules are recognized as back in 
force.

QUESTION:
How do I suppress the accidental on the cis in the final measure?

A related question is; why is it necessary to force the accidental on the dis 
in the final measure?  I suspect it is for the same reason that the cis has the 
accidental.


This somewhat more pared-down example illustrates what I mean:

%%%%%
\version "2.18.2"

\score {
  \relative c' {
    \clef F
    \time 2/4
    \key a \major
  r4-\fermata cis4 ~
  \cadenzaOn
  cis8.-[ dis!16-] e4
  \teeny
  dis16-[ c-]
  \cadenzaOff %% CADENZA IS OFF
  \normalsize
  \bar "|" %% NEW MEASURE
  g8-[ e' dis! cis-] %% WHY IS CIS WITH ACCIDENTAL/HOW TO SUPPRESS?
  }
}
%%%%%

> 
> Also, when putting manual beaming, you have ‘-[‘ and ‘-]’ but you only need
> the square brackets. It does not mess anything up but it is a lot of extra
> typing.
> 

I am aware of this.

-David