lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (hypothetical) Availability of LilyPond engravers


From: Jan-Peter Voigt
Subject: Re: (hypothetical) Availability of LilyPond engravers
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:28:12 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

Hi Urs,

well at times I try to earn some money with lilypond. And sometimes I do. But it is far less than it needs to be, so that I don't need to work in other fields.
But you can count me in, if you need someone ;)

Best,
Jan-Peter

Am 16.04.2015 um 20:03 schrieb Urs Liska:
Hi all,

<disclaimer>this is more or less hypothetical and nothing to be excited about</disclaimer>. I realize that I don't have a real idea about the size of our community, and particularly regarding the availability of music typesetters who could offer reliably continuous engraving services.

If I should be asked to engrave a big score (as fast as possible) in a commercial context and wouldn't want to reply "well, I will ask around and see how many people I can get together", what could I say? Would it be realistic to say that we could (at any time) provide a team of 10 quailfied engravers working full time on a project? Or 15-20 working half time? And what if it were a request for continuous work? Is it realistic to say there are always enough engravers at hand to accept work?

I feel that one aspect that makes publishers hesitate to consider LilyPond is exactly this question: They know that there will always be a sufficient number of available and qualified Finale and Sibelius users, and presumably even Score users, but they don't have an idea about this with LilyPond.

Any opinions or estimates?

Urs


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]