[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "procedure" vs. "function"
|
From: |
Brian Barker |
|
Subject: |
Re: "procedure" vs. "function" |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:06:47 +0100 |
At 12:55 18/04/2015 +0100, Michael Hendry wrote:
I think it was Pascal that introduced a distinction between a
Procedure (which does something without returning a value) and a
Function (which does something AND returns a value).
Really?!
Pascal: published 1970
Fortran II (included SUBROUTINE and FUNCTION): published 1958.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal_%28programming_language%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran#FORTRAN_II
Brian Barker
Re: "procedure" vs. "function", Michael Hendry, 2015/04/18
Re: "procedure" vs. "function", David Nalesnik, 2015/04/18
- Re: "procedure" vs. "function", Jacques Menu, 2015/04/18
- Re: "procedure" vs. "function", David Nalesnik, 2015/04/18
- Re: "procedure" vs. "function", PMA, 2015/04/18
- Re: "procedure" vs. "function", PMA, 2015/04/18
- Re: "procedure" vs. "function", J Martin Rushton, 2015/04/18
- Re: "procedure" vs. "function", PMA, 2015/04/18
- Re: "procedure" vs. "function", J Martin Rushton, 2015/04/18
Re: "procedure" vs. "function", Wols Lists, 2015/04/18