|
From: | Simon Albrecht |
Subject: | Re: mutopia's shortcomings |
Date: | Fri, 24 Apr 2015 20:11:53 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
Am 24.04.2015 um 16:35 schrieb Gilles:
If you’re interested, have a close look at <http://imslp.org/wiki/Symphony_No.9_%28Mahler,_Gustav%29> (UE, 1912) or <http://imslp.org/wiki/File:PMLP106915-Mendelssohn_op.79_Sechs_Sprueche.pdf> and <http://imslp.org/wiki/3_Motets,_Op.69_%28Mendelssohn,_Felix%29> (Peters, perhaps around 1900?). Nothing the likes of this will ever be engraved by a machine.On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:01:29 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:Hi Simon,You forgot the quality of sheets: a (really) digital PDF will always look better than a scanned PDF.I think it depends: firstly, many IMSLP scores are on a level of typographical quality which – I’m sorry – Lilypond might never reach.+1000Why do use LilyPond then? Or: Doesn't your appreciation need a more specific context?Like: LilyPond might never reach [that] level of typographical quality *without human tweaking*.
Yours, Simon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |