Re: 2.19 tempo mark question

[Shane Brandes]

Thanks, that was exactly what I was after I just had forgotten about
the rest of the code that needed to go with it. Absolutely good
question why isn't it been folded into LilyPond proper?

Shane

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 30.04.2015 um 22:15 schrieb tisimst:
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:56 PM, David Nalesnik-2 [via Lilypond] <[hidden
> email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> You are probably thinking of the following snippet, which actually adds
>> tempoEquationText as well as several other context properties not part of
>> the official distribution: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=869
>
>
> And *why* isn't this in the official distribution? This snippet is awesome!
>
> It’s probably ‘only’ a matter of proper documentation, a
> backwards-compatible and convenient syntax and pasting it into the actual
> source. And thus ‘getting it past the doorkeepers’.
> But I agree that this would be a good thing.
>
> Yours, Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>