lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fedora 22


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: Fedora 22
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 18:02:08 +0100


Could you post the verbose output, please?
 
You talk about 2.19.20: is this self-compiled?

--
Phil Holmes
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora 22

except, as I've said, I'm running lilypond 2.19.20 on a gentoo system with ghostscript 9.15, and I have this same problem. So this isn't limited to the versions/distros listed here.

Cheers,

A

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Jon Ciesla <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi, Fedora Lilypond maintainer.  It's broken on 2.19.19, with Ghostscript 9.16 which is in f22.  9.15 works.  There's a bug open agains ghostscript in Fedora.

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
I understand that we now deliver LilyPond with Ghostscript 9.15, and my windows installation shows 9.15 when I run it.  Your version shows 9.16, which may be the problem.  Do you know where this is being picked up from?

--
Phil Holmes
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora 22

Another confirmed, Fedora 22. The Fedora repo supplied lilypond 2.19.18 fails to compile anything. Here is a log:

http://fpaste.org/217530/



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]