lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Music function problem


From: Mark Knoop
Subject: Re: Music function problem
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 16:01:34 +0100

At 14:57 on 14 May 2015, Peter Gentry wrote:
> I have seen the error of my ways...
>
>My previous use of a function needed just a music object this was
>simply the following music expression in my case an include file of
>notes.
>
>When the function has an additional parameter this must come after the
>music not immediately after the \functionname.
>
>I was anticipating some internal Lily magic when the answer was
>simple...doh.

Well, you could just change the order of the parameters, viz:

callmyfunction =
#(define-music-function (parser location n m) (number? ly:music?) 
(anotherfunction m n))

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Thomas Morley [mailto:address@hidden 
>>Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 1:07 PM
>>To: Peter Gentry
>>Cc: lilypond-user
>>Subject: Re: Music function problem
>>
>>2015-05-14 13:44 GMT+02:00 Peter Gentry
>><address@hidden>:
>>> I am trying to write an include file that will modify a music
>>> object dependent on the specified instrument.
>>>
>>>
>>music-functions _do_ accept strings or numbers, something else 
>>must be wrong.
>>Can't say more without compilable code, though.
>>Cheers,
>>  Harm
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




-- 
Mark Knoop



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]