[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a proper whiteout function
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: a proper whiteout function |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2015 11:02:26 -0400 |
Hi Paul (et al.),
> I took Kieren up on his offer to sponsor a better whiteout stencil function.
> It’s attached so that anyone can make use of it.
Thanks for doing this! Looking forward to seeing it in action “in the wild”.
If anyone is willing to co-sponsor this function with me, please contact me
off-list and we can discuss the details.
> a more elegant approach would be to trace the outline of the stencil, but
> that’s beyond my skills
Maybe someone out there can take up the challenge? =)
> the results of this function are much better than the current 'white square'
> option.
Agreed! I’ve already used it several times in the scores I’m currently working
on, and the results are great.
Unexpectedly (and counterintuitively), there *are* certain circumstances — a
specific list of which I’m still in the process of discovering and compiling —
in which the regular [‘white square’] option is still superior to my eye. But
it’s a huge benefit to have this new function, which is preferable (to my eye)
in the vast majority of cases.
Thanks again,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- Re: a proper whiteout function, (continued)
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Paul Morris, 2015/05/19
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Janek Warchoł, 2015/05/20
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Carl Sorensen, 2015/05/20
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Janek Warchoł, 2015/05/20
- Re: a proper whiteout function, Paul Morris, 2015/05/24
Re: a proper whiteout function, Wilbert Berendsen, 2015/05/18
Re: a proper whiteout function, Carl Sorensen, 2015/05/18
Re: a proper whiteout function,
Kieren MacMillan <=