Am Sonntag, 26. Juli 2015 12:33 CEST, Marc Hohl <address@hidden> schrieb:
Am 25.07.2015 um 18:12 schrieb Víctor:
On a separate subject, I'd like to recommend you to use lyluatex
<https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex> instead of Lilypond-book. I've
found it to be a cleaner way to work as it is a LuaLaTeX package
(developed by the Gregorio team!) and not an engine.
I wanted to give this package a try and copied the two files
lyluatex.sty and lyluatex.lua in my project folder
(as described in
https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex/blob/master/README.en.md)
Now I get
! LuaTeX error ./lyluatex.lua:1: attempt to index global 'luatexbase' (a nil
value)
stack traceback:
./lyluatex.lua:1: in main chunk
[C]: in function 'dofile'
[\directlua]:1: in main chunk.
l.13 ...tlua{dofile(kpse.find_file("lyluatex.lua"))}
?
As an alternative, I made a directory in the texlive tree
$ sudo mkdir /usr/local/texlive/2014/texmf-dist/tex/lualatex/lyluatex/
and copied the files in there, followed by a
$ sudo mktexlsr
but the error message persists.
Can someone of the TeXperts explain to me what I am (obviously) doing wrong
here?
Not a TeXpert (any more), but from my quick tests - nothing.
I got the same error as you. I "fixed" this bug by adding
\usepackage{fontspec}
before using the lyluatex package.
Unfortunately, while the luatex compile now works, the output isn't what I'd
expect.
My final pdf shows a box with the name of the tmp-file that lilypond created ...
Not enough itch to scratch for me but maybe someone will be able to ebug this.
For now, I'd say this isn't a production-ready alternative to lilypond book.