Re: Fwd: [smufl-discuss] SMuFL development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group

[Steve Lacy]

Yes, I think it can do pretty much anything that the standard LilyPond syntax can do, but prohibits pretty much all usage of direct scheme, even in the simplest cases. 

It also appears as though variables are prohibited, even a simple example as :

A = { a^\markup "A" } 

\relative c' { \A b c } 

fails to compile on WikiPedia, but does work on LilyBin.  

It's fairly straightforward to create a WikiPedia account, and start editing your "User:" page as an experiment.  For example, I played around a little on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Slacy

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:55 AM, tisimst <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Steve Lacy [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]> wrote:

You're incorrect in saying that this requires Lilypond on the Users machine.  It does require LilyPond on the serving machine(s), but not on the desktop machines of the editors.  

Thank you for the clarification. I have not experimented with it, myself, but that was my perception based on the documentation. So, I assume it has the full app behind it (i.e., to create a score from any code we throw at it, as long as it can be represented as a single file)?

---

View this message in context: Re: Fwd: [smufl-discuss] SMuFL development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group

Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user