|
From: | Gergely K. |
Subject: | Re: volta repeat with and without alternative ending |
Date: | Sat, 8 Aug 2015 11:05:21 +0200 |
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Wols Lists [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]> wrote:On 24/06/15 18:42, Paul Scott wrote:
>> Because in individual part score, it will look silly (alternative endings,
>> > but they are identical)
> Not silly at all. It lets the violists know the structure. What if the
> conductor says "Start at the 2nd ending?" How will the violist(s) know
> where to start if they don't where the 2nd ending is?
But no alternative implies ALL parts are the same. Once you're away from
melody instruments, I would have thought identical repeats was a common
occurrence across pretty much al parts - who's never had a section of rests?
I'd agree with that other lister - different structures for different
parts causes no end of confusion - especially when all the conductor has
is the solo cornet part ... :-)Last thing I'm going to say on this: It's a really good idea to make the score repeat structures the same for clarity and minimal confusion. It will pay off because the musicians see what the conductor sees. That's what makes most sense to me. Anyone can agree or disagree, but I don't think there's any point deliberating over this any more.There. I've said it. ;-) Happy engraving!- Abraham
View this message in context: Re: volta repeat with and without alternative ending
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |