Re: bug in german manual

[Blöchl Bernhard]

Am 17.08.2015 20:20, schrieb David Kastrup:
> Federico Bruni <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Il giorno lun 17 ago 2015 alle 18:16, BB <address@hidden>
> > ha scritto:
> > > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation-big-page.de.html#retrograde
> > >
> > > in Chapter
> > > 1.2 Rhythmus
> > >
> > > ...
> > > Andere rhythmische Aufteilungen
> > >
> > > Triolen und andere rhythmische Aufteilungen werden aus einem
> > > musikalischen Ausdruck erstellt, indem dessen Tondauern mit einem
> > > Bruch multipliziert werden.
> > >
> > > > \times Bruch musikalischer Ausdruck
> > >
> > > Must read  \tuplet instead of \times
>
> > German translation is not up-to-date, but just yesterday a person
> > volunteered for working on it.
> > So hopefully this will be fixed.
>
> I'm afraid the text is quite correct.  It's just not overly helpful as
> the examples accompanying it have been automatically converted into
> using \tuplet rather than \times.
>
> Just changing \times to \tuplet would render the description wrong:
> indeed this requires a retranslation of the new English text.


I do not understand your mail and I am fundamentally confused!

Anyway, I hope you allow me to use
\tuplet fraction { music }
instead of
\times fraction { music }
for what the english and americans call
"tuplets" ?