[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?
|
From: |
Johan Vromans |
|
Subject: |
Re: Way to flatten nested \include's? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:40:59 +0200 |
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:23:12 +1000
Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> wrote:
> Unless you enjoy writing Scheme as much as I do!
I programmed quite a lot in lisp and APL, but never quite liked it.
From a practical point of view: every linux system comes with Perl and
Python. If you're lucky you can add Scheme yourself.
-- Johan
- Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, (continued)
- Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, David Kastrup, 2015/08/26
- RE: OT: Beauty of programming languages, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2015/08/26
- Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, David Kastrup, 2015/08/26
- Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, Phil Holmes, 2015/08/26
- Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, Martin Tarenskeen, 2015/08/26
- Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages, Urs Liska, 2015/08/26
- Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?,
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?, David Kastrup, 2015/08/25
- Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?, Andrew Bernard, 2015/08/25
- Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?, David Kastrup, 2015/08/25
- Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?, Marc Hohl, 2015/08/25
- Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?, Andrew Bernard, 2015/08/25
- Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?, Marc Hohl, 2015/08/25
- Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?, David Kastrup, 2015/08/25
Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?, Andrew Bernard, 2015/08/24