Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?

[Marc Hohl]

Am 25.08.2015 um 11:12 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> I am not sure I understand. Is having a symlink:
>
>     flatten-ly -> /home/username/bin/lilypond-wrapper.guile
>
>
> not correct? The convert-ly utility is set up as:
>
>     convert-ly -> /home/username/bin/lilypond-wrapper.python

I think that David meant that your script should be callable by lilypond
itself, something like

lilypond flatten-ly.ly

This ensures that all include paths are resolved automatically.
A shell script does not know about lilypond's way to find include files ;-)

Marc
> Andrew
>
>
> On 25/08/2015 18:11, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> wrote:
>
>
>     It's not just that.  It's also that the lilypond executable is pretty
>     sure to know the search paths of LilyPond.  You cannot really get them
>     reliably without calling LilyPond, and if you do that anyway, why not
>     use its interpreter?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user