Re: Way to flatten nested \include's?

[David Kastrup]

Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> writes:

>> On 25/08/2015 18:11, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's not just that.  It's also that the lilypond executable is pretty
>> sure to know the search paths of LilyPond.  You cannot really get them
>> reliably without calling LilyPond, and if you do that anyway, why not
>> use its interpreter?
>
> I am not sure I understand. Is having a symlink:
>
> flatten-ly -> /home/username/bin/lilypond-wrapper.guile
>
> not correct?

I can't say anything about the wrappers used here.  I was pointing out
that calling a Scheme procedure via the lilypond executable has the
advantage of having search paths etc set correctly.

You can do that with

lilypond -e '(load "xxx.scm")'

-- 
David Kastrup