Re: Scholarly footnotes

[Urs Liska]

Am 13. November 2015 13:29:30 MEZ, schrieb Graham King <address@hidden>:
>On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 12:45 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> 
>> Am 12.11.2015 um 09:09 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> > Having had a night over it I realized that there is an obvious
>first
>> > step towards b) and c) and that the infrastructure is already there
>for it!
>> > I will add support for writing out the raw Scheme object and simply
>> > integrate it as an additional export-target. I wouldn't mind if
>someone
>> > would give me a hint with regard to (de-)serializing a Scheme
>object to
>> > and from a file before I'll have the opportunity to look into it
>myself ;-)
>> >
>> > When that file is available I can then see at what point it's there
>so I
>> > can see if b) or c) or both are possible.
>> >
>> > Urs
>> >
>> 
>> Just for reference: I've added an issue and started work with an
>initial
>> commit:
>> https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/issues/138
>> 
>
>Owing to <ahem> a technical problem (a glitch in the keyboard-seat
>interface at this end) I've only just seen the last three postings in
>this branch of the thread.  This looks very promising.  I might
>struggle
>a bit at first to get from Scheme to lilypond markup, but that's
>nothing
>compared to the heavy-lifting already done.

The problem is that so far the export isn't proper Scheme but a string 
representation that LilyPond won't even read in.

>
>-- Graham
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.