[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving a single note (optical spacing once more)
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Moving a single note (optical spacing once more) |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:46:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
Am 04.12.2015 um 12:12 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> "Urs Liska" wrote Friday, December 04, 2015 10:59 AM
>
>> Am 04.12.2015 um 11:54 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>>> \once ] \override Arpeggio.minimum-X-extent =#'(-1 . 0)
>> This creates additional space by moving the Arpeggio to the right. But I
>> want the fourth note e' to move to the left because the intention is to
>> keep the regularity of the left hand intact.
> Ah, sorry, I should have also said leave optical spacing on
> and slightly increase the same-direction-correction from the
> default value of 0.25:
>
> \once \override NoteSpacing.same-direction-correction = 0.5
>
> seems a reasonable compromise. Larger values make the notes
> of the left hand more regular in this example (but that may
> depend on the note pitches).
No, that doesn't work at all in my actual score.
It seems unifrom-stretching as the global setting is the only way to get
the score in a usable state, and what I need is an option to really move
that fouth semiquaver to the left.
In a way LilyPond should perform the optical spacing to the semiquavers
three and four but then don't start the next group earlier. Indeed this
is what my hand-engraved model score does.
It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a single note
that doesn't have any dependencies ...
Urs
> Trevor