[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rounded beams
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Rounded beams |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:26:43 -0500 |
Hi all,
> If printed beams were supposed to be curved,
> they would have been easy to engrave into plates […]
> But it does not appear like that was desired.
Indeed. I'd guess that straight beams were quickly determined to be superior to
curved beams for at least two reasons:
(a) straight beams encourage the reader to more accurately assess, at a glance,
the [overall] direction, [overall] slope, and approximate duration of the
beamed group; and
(b) straight beams differentiate themselves more strongly from curved musical
objects/items (including ties. slurs, and certain scripts).
Cheers,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- Rounded beams, Urs Liska, 2015/12/15
- Re: Rounded beams, Evans Winner, 2015/12/15
- Re: Rounded beams, Andrew Bernard, 2015/12/16
- Re: Rounded beams, David Kastrup, 2015/12/16
- Re: Rounded beams,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Rounded beams, ciconia, 2015/12/16
- Re: Rounded beams, Andrew Bernard, 2015/12/16
- [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/16
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Simon Albrecht, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", David Kastrup, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", mskala, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", mskala, 2015/12/17
- Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams", Andrew Bernard, 2015/12/18