|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Strings as variable names |
Date: | Mon, 28 Dec 2015 19:01:47 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 |
Am 28.12.2015 um 13:29 schrieb Johan Vromans: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:51:51 +0100 > David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote: > >> "xxx" = ... >> >> has always been allowed for arbitrary strings. >> >>> And so the NR should in fact therefore be updated? >> >> It's not really making stuff more readable. > > Now if only this would work: > > \version "2.19.33" > > bella_melodia_cello = \relative c' { > r4- ef\upbow(f) r g | > } > > part = cello > > \score { > \"bella_melodia_\part" > } > > I can think of some use cases for this. I think something like this should be achievable using a music function with two string arguments. It could concatenate them in an arbitrary fashion and find the appropriate variable through the parser commands. Urs > > -- Johan > http://johan.vromans.org/seasons_greetings.html > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > address@hidden > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |