|
| From: | Mark Knoop |
| Subject: | Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:28:03 +0000 |
At 17:15 on 12 Jan 2016, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> b) have *no* beamlets at all and let the subdivision be calculated >> as usual (fourth attachment) > >This is what I prefer. > +1. Gould seems to always use stemlets with beamlets when the beam count > 2. -- Mark Knoop
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |