Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

[Urs Liska]

Am 13.01.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Urs Liska:

Hi all,

one more beaming question,

given the following input

\relative a' {
  \time 6/8
  \set strictBeatBeaming = ##t
  a8.. a32 a16 a
}

which of the attached engravings do you prefer, LilyPond's current or
the modified?
Would it make sense to add a beaming option (e.g.
"strictBeatBeamingNonFlagSide") so the user can choose?

Note that I think this is actually the difference between subdivideBeams being ##t or ##f.
Currently LilyPond produces the second rendering from my previous post, regardless of subdivisions or not.

So I'd say *with* strictBeatBeaming *and* subdivided beams the non-flag side should have its stems governed by the rhythmic position of the subdivision while with strictBeatBeaming and *no* subdivisions it should have the beam number of the following stem.

Objections?

Urs

Best
Urs

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user