lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation


From: Chris Yate
Subject: Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:40:45 +0000

Wow. Clairnote looks like an incredibly stupid idea, and a grand disservice to any poor child who you teach to read it.  Simplified notation is not a lot better.

Unless they spend their lives playing on their own at home, musicians have eventually to play with other people who will have learnt a method of notation that's been good for 400 years.

Chris

On 25 January 2016 at 21:38, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
On 25.01.2016 22:19, musicus wrote:
I just struggled with studying a complex music piece and thought that all the chromatic lines are horrible to read in standard notation. Especially the "enharmonic problem" is distracting the musician from a very simple musical structure. So I tried some of my ideas and can present one, which is IMO good to read.

See attached. Comments, suggestions are very welcome ;)

Reminds me of Clairnote, a more radical approach, which has also been realised with LilyPond: <http://clairnote.org/>.

Best, Simon

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]