RE: Learning more complicated lilypond coding

[Charles O. Lawrence]

Thanks Trevor for the “hack”.  I understand the code, but what is the s, and where is it documented?

 

Charles

 

From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 6:15 PM
To: Charles O. Lawrence <address@hidden>; address@hidden
Subject: Re: Learning more complicated lilypond coding

 

Hi Charles

 

There may well be a nicer way, but here's a quick hack:

 

\relative c' {
  \clef treble
  \time 2/4
  s8*1/1024
  \clef bass r8*1023/1024
}

----- Original Message -----

From: Charles O. Lawrence

To: address@hidden

Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 10:54 PM

Subject: Learning more complicated lilypond coding

 

For my edification in learning more complicated lilypond coding techniques, could one of you gurus post a sample of how to code the attached measure.  The complication, for me at least, is the fact that the r8 should come after the bass clef.  With this code

 

\relative c' {\clef treble \time 2/4 \clef bass r8}

 

the initial treble clef disappears.  Perhaps this behavior is the norm, but I would like the r8 to appear after the mid measure bass clef, as shown in the image.  I’m sure it can be done.  What say you.

 

Charles Lawrence

---

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user