[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parenthesised articulations
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Parenthesised articulations |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:02:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> To LilyPond, braces indicate sequential music.
>
> Well, clearly there’s more going on than simply “sequential music”, or else
>
> \transpose c c’ { c d }
>
> would be no different than
>
> \transpose c c’ { c } d
>
> which clearly isn’t true.
It clearly isn't true. Also it is a non-sequitur. \transpose, like
many music functions, takes one music expression. Which can be a
sequential music expression, even an empty one (which is still an
expression of type SequentialMusic, just one with () as its elements
field).
>> Of course it sees the subsequent braces and acts according to their
>> meaning
>
> Then there’s no technical reason why my suggestion couldn’t work.
> That’s all I asked.
Shrug. You'll find that convincing LilyPond is not as easy as
convincing yourself. It's not particularly susceptible to syllogisms.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, David Kastrup, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, David Kastrup, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, David Kastrup, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, David Kastrup, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/01
- Re: Parenthesised articulations,
David Kastrup <=