[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Super and sub
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Super and sub |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Feb 2016 10:00:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
John Gourlay <address@hidden> writes:
> I was thinking that text produced by LilyPond would likely be about
> music, with references, for example, to chords with superscripts in
> their names. It would appear odd if the chord names in text appeared
> differently than in the music itself.
Currently we have different subscript heights in pretty much every
national chord format (probably because the localizers thought that the
defaults sucked). So unifying this would be some kind of work. Some of
the differences may also be intentional.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Super and sub, (continued)
Re: Super and sub, John Gourlay, 2016/02/06
Re: Super and sub, David Kastrup, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Noeck, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Noeck, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Phil Holmes, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Urs Liska, 2016/02/07
Re: Super and sub, Thomas Morley, 2016/02/07
Re: Super and sub, Phil Holmes, 2016/02/07