[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: manual Makam example
From: |
BB |
Subject: |
Re: manual Makam example |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:00:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
I still think that the snippet ifrom the world music chapter is better
than the one actually in the arabic chapter. I will recommend it in the
bug-lilypond mailing list, if I find some time. Actually I am fighting
with some problems.
I would post a better one, if I could get an example code! There is some
inconsistency. If i use
\include arabic.ly
the arabic maqams are defined and will be found, but the english note
names are not known.
\include "arabic.ly"
\relative do' {
\key re \bayati
%\set Staff.extraNatural = ##f
dod dob dosd \dwn dob dobsb dodsd do do
}
That is another important fact to say that given example in the arabic
chapter is double-crap! This snippet indeed uses english note names not
known with \arabic.ly!
As I prefer the english note names. If I use
\include maqam.ly
the maqams are undefined, but the english note names are known.
\include "makam.ly"
\relative c' {
\key d \bayati
c4 cc db fk
gbm4 gfc gfb efk
fk4 db cc c
}
If I try the definition of Bayati from arabic.ly, the resukt is vey
strange, I do not understand why?
\include "makam.ly" \relative c' { \set Staff.keyAlterations = #`( (0 .
,NATURAL) (1 . ,SEMI-FLAT) (2 . ,FLAT) (3 . ,NATURAL) (4 . ,NATURAL) (5
. ,FLAT) (6 . ,FLAT) ) c4 cc db fk gbm4 gfc gfb efk fk4 db cc c }
I think that ha s to do with the missing key alteration order? May be an
extension/redesign of maqam.ly is necessary? Help would be appreciated!
On 21.02.2016 13:27, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 21.02.2016 12:54, BB wrote:
At the end of subchapter "Arabic key signatures" in chapter "2.10.2
Arabic music" on page
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/arabic-music
there is in subchapter "Selected Snippets" a snippet example. It is
very peculiar that in this example is not even a single quarter tone.
Peculiar and totally displaced and useless in this arabic notation
section dealing with the special case of quarter tone notation!
You’re welcome to come up with a better example and post it on the
bug-lilypond mailing list, with a concise description what exactly it
is for and why it is better.
Best, Simon