lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Staff-staff spacing temporary changes


From: Noeck
Subject: Re: Staff-staff spacing temporary changes
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:29:19 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

Hi Andrew,

Am 23.02.2016 um 08:26 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> Hi Joram,
> 
> Right indeed. But if I adjust stretchability, it affects the rest of my
> score adversely, and I cannot find a good compromise that leaves the
> main score relatively wide spaced with respect to staff-staff spacing,
> and then a particular page with fewer systems closely spaced. 

I really thought this suggestion to be promising and I meant my
questions as real questions and I am interested in your answer about
where you want to put that space!

Here is a small example which comes close to what I think you are
talking about, but I am not sure:

\version "2.19.36"

\paper {
  system-count = 8
  top-system-spacing.basic-distance = 20
  last-bottom-spacing.stretchability = 100
}

\new PianoStaff <<
  \new Staff {
    \repeat unfold 6 s1 \pageBreak
    \repeat unfold 4 s1 \pageBreak
    \repeat unfold 6 s1
  }
  \new Staff {
    \clef bass
    \repeat unfold 16 s1
  }
>>

This has 3 pages, with 3,2,3 staves each. The 2 staves are not much more
separated as the 3 staves per page, because I increased the
stretchability of the last-bottom-spacing so much. That would be
something I would prefer in case of such an empty page. But I don't know
your taste, that's why I would be really interested in your answer to my
question above. As Carl writes:

> Prepare a small example that shows the problem and give the list a chance
> to solve it.

Cheers,
Joram



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]