[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staff-staff spacing temporary changes
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Staff-staff spacing temporary changes |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:29:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
Hi Andrew,
Am 23.02.2016 um 08:26 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> Hi Joram,
>
> Right indeed. But if I adjust stretchability, it affects the rest of my
> score adversely, and I cannot find a good compromise that leaves the
> main score relatively wide spaced with respect to staff-staff spacing,
> and then a particular page with fewer systems closely spaced.
I really thought this suggestion to be promising and I meant my
questions as real questions and I am interested in your answer about
where you want to put that space!
Here is a small example which comes close to what I think you are
talking about, but I am not sure:
\version "2.19.36"
\paper {
system-count = 8
top-system-spacing.basic-distance = 20
last-bottom-spacing.stretchability = 100
}
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff {
\repeat unfold 6 s1 \pageBreak
\repeat unfold 4 s1 \pageBreak
\repeat unfold 6 s1
}
\new Staff {
\clef bass
\repeat unfold 16 s1
}
>>
This has 3 pages, with 3,2,3 staves each. The 2 staves are not much more
separated as the 3 staves per page, because I increased the
stretchability of the last-bottom-spacing so much. That would be
something I would prefer in case of such an empty page. But I don't know
your taste, that's why I would be really interested in your answer to my
question above. As Carl writes:
> Prepare a small example that shows the problem and give the list a chance
> to solve it.
Cheers,
Joram